Comments on: Strange Earth-Lights Preceded Chilean Earthquake?

By: organelle

organelle — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:59:58 +0000

Earthquake ‘frequency’ can be measured in different ways. You will notice that phillyguy (with good intentions) delimits his statistics to EQs of 6+ mag. There are places on the Earth where there has been 0% increase over the past 12 months, and there are places where there has (I am estimating) been a 400+%. I suspect there are places that have experienced a 10000% increase. It depends on where you look, and how you use the statistics you can gather.

But if, for example, one examined the USGS maps of California, daily, over the past year, one would see a verifiable and radical shift in quake # and frequency, certainly on an order far above a 100% increase (doubling). And more, for nearly all of 2010, this increase has remained constant, and is therefore not merely a brief anomalous surge.

By: Micah

Micah — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:43:49 +0000

Greetings Phillyguy,

I apologize for not getting to your comment sooner! I had missed it, while it awaited approval in my cache.

The “400%” figure was provided by a gentleman who independently sent me his observations. This fellow prefers to remain anonymous, and I respect this request. However, I can’t independently confirm or verify that claim myself, since I am not the author. I do always try and encourage open communication and correspondence, hence I included it in my post.

All the best,

-Micah A. Hanks

By: Алексей

Алексей — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:01:15 +0000

... Хм ...

By: Phillyguy

Phillyguy — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:41:42 +0000

Could you be more specific about your statement that earthquakes are up 400%? I looked at the USGS site and saw that there were 10 earthquakes over 6.5 from 1/1/10 to 2/24/10; there were about 80 such quakes in 2009. That seems like a lower frequency for 2010. Obviously, there are many ways of looking at the stats, but I didn’t see anything that corresponded to your statement.

By: organelle

organelle — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:18:45 +0000

It seems clear that time and space are not as linear as we once thought, and more – that both may be somewhat like the earth in that they are comprised of ancient flows shot through with relatively new growth. When magma is ejected up toward the surface crust, what we get is something like ‘fresh stone-time’ — uncharactered ‘new growth’ which begins acquiring character only once it is changed from flow to material. It seems that there are in fact two basic elemental states: flow and solidity. Earth, and we as her living constituents, are now beginning to have new kinds of experience as the ‘midnight hour’ changes and the guardian of the clocks also transforms.

Perhaps the visual effects near Earthquakes actually have to do with sudden temporal shifting which is so dramatic (albeit seeming localized) that it actually affects light itself. This idea, while seeming absurd, is far less strange than it superficially appears: time is fundamentally relational, and, during crises, everyone knows that our experience of time is radically altered — and this is precisely because it is relational rather than mechanical. When the Earth (the living transtemporal supercontext) changes, everyone on it experiences new relationships with multiply emerging time-flows. Some of these are ancient, some brand new. Like scars on our own bodies, when flow is turned into material, we get — right next to each other — new time and old time. Like parents living with children, this is a wonderful and challenging gift.

“Remember your First Cell”